ABHILASHA KUMARI
HEENA TOURS AND TRAVELS – Appellant
Versus
HITEN SHAH – Respondent
1. By invoking the writ jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has made the following prayers:
“(A) Be pleased to quash and set aside notice dated 4.11.11 passed below in Consumer Complaint Case No.595 of 2011 and consumer complaint no.595 of 2011 by Hon'ble District Vadodara Consumer Forum.
(B) Pending hearing, admission and final disposal of this Petition, be pleased to stay the proceedings of Consumer Complaint Case No.595 of 2011 pending on the file of Hon'ble District Vadodara Consumer Forum.
(C) Costs of this Petition.
(D) Any other relief which Hon'ble Court may deem just, fit, proper and equitable in the facts of the case.”
2. The petitioner is a Partnership Firm by the name and style of Heena Tours and Travels. Although the factual matrix of the case has not been set out in detail in the petition, it can be discerned from the material on record that respondents Nos.1 and 2, with their families, booked a tour to Bhutan through the petitioner-Firm. Thereafter, a complaint was filed by the said respondents before the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Vadodara (“the Forum” for short), against the petitioner, bei
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.