SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Guj) 439

K.N.BASHA
Vijayakumar – Appellant
Versus
Amirthavalli – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
M. C. Swamy, for Petitioner; K. V. Sridharan, for Respondent.

ORDER

Mr. M. C. Swamy, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has come forward with this petition seeking for the relief of setting aside the order passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate No. II, Chidambaramin C.M.P. No. 462 of 2007 in C.C. No. 655 of 2006 allowing the petition filed under S. 302, Cr.P.C. seeking permission to the com-plainant"s-husband to conduct the prosecution on behalf of the complainant.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the learned Magistrate has passed the order without considering the infirmities involved in this matter in respect of power of attorney given in favour of the husband of the complainant. It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that any appointment of power of attorney should be processed by an appropriate order of the Court. Therefore, it is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner in this case the power of attorney was executed prior to the filing of the complaint and the respondent-complainant has not obtained any Court order for execution of such power of attorney. Learned counsel for the petitioner also placed reliance on the decision of the Hon"ble Supreme Co















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top