High Court of Gujarat
A.L.Dave, R.M.Chhaya
Rakeshkumar Somabhai Thakore
Vs.
State of Gujarat
Criminal APPEAL No.179 of 2003
Decided On : Mar 28, 2011
Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 300 and Section 302 read with Section 114 - Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 3 - Bombay Police Act, 1951 - Section 135 - Offence of Murder - Convicted - Appeal against Conviction - Assault - Alleged appellant assaulted deceased with knife and inflicted blows on his chest resulting which result his death -A2 helped appellant-accused actively - Sister-in-law of deceased along with her son was going to school of his son at time of aforesaid incident - PW-2 immediately ran at place where deceased fell down and she saw A1 and A2 running away with knife - Held, From evidence on record that bodily injuries of deceased were sufficient in ordinary course of nature to cause death - It is also evident from evidence on record that there was an intention to inflict those particular bodily injuries with deadly weapon with knowledge that same would result into death - Act of accused would squarely fall within purview of Section 300 thirdly' punishable under Section 302 of IPC - Prosecution prove guilt of accused - Conviction confirm - Appeal Dismissed
R.M.CHHAYA, J.
(1) The present appeal is filed against judgment and order passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court No.2, Ahmedabad (Rural) on 31.12.2002 in Sessions Case No.48 of 1998, convicting the appellant (original accused No.1) for the offence punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 ('the IPC' for short) and sentencing him to imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- in default, to suffer simple imprisonment for six months. Accused No.2-Rajubhai Devilal Mevati (A2) was acquitted of all the charges by the learned trial Court.
(2) The case of the prosecution is that the appellant-accused and the victim, Vajesing Babusing Thakore, (the deceased) were residing at Jagatpur, Dist. Ahmedabad and were neighbours. One day before the date of incident i.e. 26.11.1997, the brother of the deceased, Mathurji Babusing Thakore (PW-5), had altercation with the appellant-accused at a pan shop, near the society. That keeping grudge of the aforesaid incident in mind, on 27.11.1997, at about 11:30 hrs., while the deceased was towing the bicycle and was passing through Nakoda Society, Ambe Ma Chowk of village Jagatpur, the appellant-accused assaulted him with a knife and inflicted blows on his chest. That A2 helped the appellant-accused actively. That sister-in-law of the deceased, Shailaben w/o. Banesing (PW-2), along with her son-Ajay was going to school of his son at the time of the aforesaid incident. That PW-2 immediately ran at the place where the deceased fell down and she saw A1 and A2 running away with knife. That therefore, PW-2, along with her father-in-law, mother-in-law, brother-in-law and aunty and other relatives of the deceased took the deceased in Civil Hospital, Ahmedabad where the medical officer on duty on examination declared him dead. That immediately at the civil hospital itself yadi came to be noted about the deceased having expired and thereafter, as the incident occurred within the local jurisdiction of Sarkhej Police Station, PW-2, who is an eye-witness, lodged an F.I.R., which came to be registered as C.R. No.I-179 of 1997 at Sarkhej Police Station for the offences punishable under Section 302 read with Section 114 of the IPC and Section 135 of the Bombay Police Act, 1951. On the very next day A1 was arrested in Sabarmati area by Sabarmati Police and later on he was brought to Sarkhej Police Station.
On the basis of the FIR above-mentioned, the police started investigation and after full-fleged investigation, police submitted charge-sheet against the accused.
(3) Learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Ahmedabad (Rural) on receipt of such charge-sheet, so submitted by the police, committed the case to the Court of learned Sessions Judge, Ahmedabad as the case was being exclusively triable by the Court of Sessions and the same was registered as Sessions Case No.48 of 1998.
(4) The learned Judge, on appearance of the accused and on perusal of the materials available on record, including the police papers as well as also upon hearing the learned counsel for the parties, framed charges below Exh.7 against the accused under Sections 302 read with Section 114 of the IPC and Section 135 of the B.P. Act. The entire charges were read over to the accused to which they pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried.
The trial court proceeded with the trial and after considering all evidence led by the prosecution, more particularly the oral testimonies of PW-2, Shailaben w/o. Banesing (Exh.17), who is the eye-witness, PW-3, Ganeshbhai Motibhai Mistry (Exh.19) and PW-5, Mathurji Babusing Thakore, who happens to be the brother of the deceased, so also the oral testimony of PW-11, Ramanbhai Kodarbhai Patel, Investigating Officer (Exh.37), came to the conclusion that the prosecution has successfully established the charges leveled against the present accused-appellant and specifically believed the case of the prosecution. Relying upon the same, the learned trial Judge had r
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.