SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Guj) 345

M.R.SHAH
BABUBHAI KESHABHAI VALAND – Appellant
Versus
RAMESHBHAI RAMABHAI PRAJAPATI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
MR JA ADESHRA for Appellant(s) : 1,
RULE SERVED BY DS for Defendant(s) : 1,

JUDGMENT

[1.0] Present Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as “CPC”) has been preferred by the appellant herein – original plaintiff to quash and set aside the impugned judgment and decree dated 25.07.2005 passed by the learned trial Court - learned 4th Additional Sr. Civil Judge, Nadiad in Regular Civil Suit No.235 of 2003 as well as the impugned judgment and order dated 29.02.2012 passed by the learned Appellate Court – learned 7th (Ad-hoc) Additional District Judge, Kheda at Nadiad in Regular Civil Appeal No.332 of 2005 by which the learned lower Appellate Court has dismissed the said Appeal preferred by the appellant herein – original plaintiff by confirming the judgment and decree passed by the learned trial Court dismissing the suit.

[2.0] Facts leading to filing of the present Second Appeal in nut-shell are as under:

[2.1] That the appellant herein – original plaintiff instituted Regular Civil Suit No.235 of 2003 against the respondent herein – original defendant in the Court of learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Nadiad for specific performance of the Agreement to Sale. That the learned trial Court framed the issue



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top