M.R.SHAH
BABUBHAI KESHABHAI VALAND – Appellant
Versus
RAMESHBHAI RAMABHAI PRAJAPATI – Respondent
[1.0] Present Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as “CPC”) has been preferred by the appellant herein – original plaintiff to quash and set aside the impugned judgment and decree dated 25.07.2005 passed by the learned trial Court - learned 4th Additional Sr. Civil Judge, Nadiad in Regular Civil Suit No.235 of 2003 as well as the impugned judgment and order dated 29.02.2012 passed by the learned Appellate Court – learned 7th (Ad-hoc) Additional District Judge, Kheda at Nadiad in Regular Civil Appeal No.332 of 2005 by which the learned lower Appellate Court has dismissed the said Appeal preferred by the appellant herein – original plaintiff by confirming the judgment and decree passed by the learned trial Court dismissing the suit.
[2.0] Facts leading to filing of the present Second Appeal in nut-shell are as under:
[2.1] That the appellant herein – original plaintiff instituted Regular Civil Suit No.235 of 2003 against the respondent herein – original defendant in the Court of learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Nadiad for specific performance of the Agreement to Sale. That the learned trial Court framed the issue
B.V. Nagesh and Anr. vs. H.V. Sreenivasa Murthy reported in (2010)13 SCC 530
G. Amalorpavam and Ors. vs. R.C. Diocese of Madurai and Ors. reported in (2006)3 SCC 224
Madhukar vs. Sangram reported in (2001) 4 SCC 756
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.