SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(Guj) 180

H.N.DEVANI
Ashokbhai Rameshchandra Ghantivala – Appellant
Versus
State Of Gujarat – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Asim Pandya, H.L. Patel, Trusha Patel.

JUDGMENT

1. BY this petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to as 'the Code') and Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed to quash chargesheet No. 135 of 2005 dated 23rd July, 2005 qua the present petitioner.

2. THE facts of the case stated briefly are that the respondent No. 2 herein had fled the First Information Report with the rander Police Station, Surat being C. R. No. 1-135 of 2005 for the offences punishable under Sections 467, 468, 471 and 114 of the Indian Penal Code. The allegations in the F. I. R. are to the effect that the complainant is the owner of an agricultural land bearing Block No. 981 of revenue Survey No. 952 of village Variyav which is running in the name of Dahyabhai dwarkadas Patel, the father of the complainant, in the revenue record. According to the complainant, his father had expired on 2nd March, 1999. However, necessary mutation entry has not been effected in the revenue record. It is the case of the complainant that on 16th February, 2005, a person came to his house and enquired whether the land owned by him was to be sold. The said person showed him a copy of the general power of














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top