SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Guj) 251

K.A.Puj
Gopinathji Dev Mandir Trust – Appellant
Versus
Ishwarbhai Dhirajlal Parekh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Dipak M. Thakkar, R.C. Kakkad

JUDGMENT

Mr. K.A. PUJ

1. The petitioners - original plaintiffs have filed this Civil Revision Application under Section 29 (2) of the Bombay Rent Act challenging the judgment and order dated 06.01.1994 passed, by the learned Assistant Judge, Bhavnagar in Regular Civil Appeal No. 129 of 1986 setting aside the judgment and decree passed by the learned Joint Civil Judge (J.D.), Botad on 30.09.1986 in Regular Civil Suit No.73 of 1981.

2. This Civil Revision Application was admitted and rule was issued on 23.02.2005.

Mr. Dipak M. Thakkar, learned Advocate appearing for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioner No. 1 - Trust and its Trustees have filed Regular Civil Suit No.73 of 1981 before the learned Civil Judge (J.D.), Gadhda against the respondents for obtaining the decree of eviction on the ground of acquisition of alternative suitable accommodation and non-user of the said suit premises. The said suit was filed by the then Trustees of the Trust. He has further submitted that the respondent appeared in the said suit and filed his written statement. After filing of the suit, the election of the Trust took place on 15.04.1984 and the new Trustees were elected therein. As a resu









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top