Jayant Patel
Dipakbhai L. Patel – Appellant
Versus
Firoj Rustamji Bhadra – Respondent
1. The short facts of this case appears to be that the respondent no. 1 filed private complaint before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Navsari against the petitioner, who was at the relevant point of time, the Manager of Bank of India, Vijalpore Branch, and the petitioner was holding the post of Cashier In-charge of the Bank. The accusation in the complaint is that the petitioner had proceeded on leave and thereafter he wanted to assume the duty but the same was not permitted by the Manager of the Bank without production of the medical fitness certificate. As per the complainant, production of medical certificate was not required but the Manager insisted for such certificate and as stated in the complaint, he insisted under the instructions of the higher authority. Therefore, as per the complainant, he was wrongfully restrained, therefore, the offence under sec. 341 of IPC was committed by the petitioner -accused hence, the complaint was filed.
2. Learned Magistrate directed for holding the inquiry under sec. 202 of CrPC through police and the report thereafter was submitted before the learned Magistrate. After considering the report, the learned Magistrate found tha
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.