SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Guj) 363

HARSHA DEVANI, R.M.CHHAYA
Chaudhary Industries – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Rakesh Gupta, Amee Yajnik

JUDGMENT

R.M. CHHAYA, J.

1. BY way of this petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners have challenged communication dated 31.12.2001, whereby the respondent No.3 herein directed the petitioners to observe customs procedure as prescribed under the law and file Bill of Entry under S.46 of the Customs Act, 1962 (hereinafter referred to as the Act for the sake of brevity) for the vessel named M.V. GLORIA KOPP which was purchased by the petitioners in auction from respondent No.5, further informing the petitioners that the customs duty is required to be collected under Chapter CTH 8908.

2. THE facts as per the record of this petition are as under:

That the petitioner No.1 is a registered partnership firm engaged in the business of ship breaking and petitioner No.2 is Managing Partner of petitioner No.1.

3. RESPONDENT No.5 Commissioner of Customs, Chennai floated tender for sale of confiscated vessel/ship named M.V. GLORIA KOPP which stipulated various conditions. As per the said tender notice amongst other, the conditions nos. 10 and 11 read as under :

"10. TAXES and DUTIES : will be charged extra as per TNGST Act as applicable on date of billing an





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top