ORDER:- In Small Cause case No.348 of 1958, a decree was passed in favour of the plaintiff firm, a consignee of goods, against the Union of India owning the Western Railway for damages in respect of deterioration of goods booked Bilimora to Rajkot. The consignor did not file the suit, but the consignee, in whose name the railway receipt was prepared, filed a suit for damages. Admittedly, damage was caused to the goods.

2. The only point urged in revision is that the lower Court has erred in passing a decree in favour of a bare consignee and that as the suit was not filed by the consignor who was a party to the contract of consignment, the suit should have been dismissed, as it was a suit filed by a bare consignee against the Railway. The contention is well founded. This is a case of bailment of goods to the Railway. The word "bailment" is thus defined in section 148 of the Indian Contract Act:-

"A "bailment" is the delivery of goods by one person to another for some purpose, upon a contract that they shall, when the purpose is accomplished, be returned or disposed of according to the directions of the person delivering them."

Sub-section (1) of section 72 of the Indian Railways Act re

Click Here to Read the rest of this document