SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Guj) 82

BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA, J.B.PARDIWALA
Arunbhai Ramjibhai Patel – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat – Respondent


JUDGMENT

BHASKAR BHATTACHARYA, J.

All these Special Civil Applications were taken up together as the subject-matter of challenge in all these applications is the legality and validity of a Circular dated 9th May, 2007 issued by the Respondent No. 2 purporting to be as part of simplification of the Rule 45(1) of Registration Rules, viz. the Gujarat Registration Rules, 1970.

2. In order to appreciate the aforesaid question, it will be profitable to refer to the Circular dated 9th May, 2007 which is quoted below:

xxx xxx xxx

CIRCULAR:

In the State the documents of the immovable properties are registered in the office of the Sub-Registrar. From experience it is learnt that, in the absence of sufficient knowledge about the law/rules the documents with insufficient stamp duty are lying in the office without registration. Due to non-registration of the pending documents the copy of the document and the index-2 are not supplied, due to this reason the party has misunderstandings without any reasons. Thus, with the bona fide intentions for bringing about convenience, transparency in the administration and to return the documents to the parties after registration and as part of simplification the






























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top