SONIA GOKANI, AKIL KURESHI
RAJMOTI INDUSTRIES – Appellant
Versus
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX – Respondent
(PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI)
1. These appeals are filed by assessee challenging the common judgment of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (“the Tribunal” for short) dated 30.9.2013.
2. Facts being similar, we may notice those arising in Tax Appeal No.105 of 2014. Appeal involves assessment year 2007-08. For the said assessment year, assessee filed return of income declaring total income of Rs.83.28 lakhs (rounded off). The return was taken in scrutiny. The assessing officer framed order of assessment dated 31.12.2009. In such order, he disallowed a sum of Rs.26,72,198/- being 20% of the total payment of Rs.1,33,60,988/- made by the assessee during the year under consideration otherwise than by account payee cheque in violation of provisions of section 40A(3)(a) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short “ the Act”).
3. The assessee carried the matter in appeal. CIT(Appeals)dismissed the assessee’s appeal. CIT(Appeals) examined further facts as urged by the assessee for which remand report was called for from the assessing officer.
4. He highlighted such facts as under:-
4.5 All this factual matrix clearly establishes that the cheques were otherwise than Account Paye
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.