K.M.THAKER
M. V. Vinalines Fortuna – Appellant
Versus
Saurashtra Fuels Private Limited – Respondent
JUDGEMNT
K.M. THAKER, J.
1. The applicant No. 1 in present application is the original defendant No. 1 and applicant No. 2 is the original defendant No. 2 in the Admiralty Suit No. 9 of 2009.
2. In present application, the applicants have prayed, inter alia, that:-
“10. (a) The Admiralty Suit No. 9 of 2009 filed by the opponents in this Hon'ble Court be stayed in view of the binding arbitration agreement between the parties.
(b) The Letter of Undertaking dated 12th August, 2009 furnished by the London Steam-ship Owners' Mutual Insurance Association Ltd. in favour of the opponents to secure the release of the first applicant vessel be returned to the applicants duly discharged.”
3. The original defendants i.e. present applicants have taken out present application in the pending Admiralty Suit filed by present opponent against present applicants wherein present opponent has, inter alia, prayed for arrest of the applicant No. 1 vessel and other relief including the request for order and decree in its favour and against present applicants in the sum of Rs. 15,43,78,835/-.
4. In the suit taken out by present opponent, the Court granted ex-parte order dated 29.7.2009 whereby direction for
Videsh Sanchar Nigam Ltd. vs. M.V. Kapitan Kud
Bharat Aluminium Company vs. Kaiser Aluminium Technical Services INC
Chloro Controls India Pvt. Ltd. vs. Severn Trent Water Purification INC
Vessel M.V. Baltic Confidence & Another vs. State Trading Corporation of India Ltd. & Another
Olympus Superstructure Pvt. Ltd. vs. Meena Vijay Khetan & Others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.