SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Guj) 596

VIJAY MANOHAR SAHAI, R.P.DHOLARIA
JAYESH S. JOSHI – Appellant
Versus
UMRETH MUNICIPALITY – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
MR AJ SHASTRI, ADVOCATE for the Appellant(s) No. 1

JUDGMENT :

VIJAY MANOHAR SAHAI, J.

1. We have heard learned advocate Mr.A.J.Shastri, learned advocate appearing for the appellant.

2. By way of the present Letters Patent Appeal, the appellant–original petitioner has challenged the order dated 07.12.2012 passed by the learned Single Judge in Special Civil Application No.14200 of 2007, by which, learned Single Judge has dismissed the writ petition, wherein the order dated 6.3.2007 passed by the Labour Court was challenged.

3. In our opinion, the learned Single Judge while dismissing the writ petition has not issued a writ of certiorari and the Labour Court was not made a party and therefore, the decision of the Five Judges' Full Bench of this Court will apply to the facts of this case.

4. The Five Judges' Full Bench of this Court in the case of Gujarat State Road Transport Corporation v.Firoze M.Mogal and another, 2014 GLH 1 rendered in Letters Patent Appeal No.1149of2002,Dated:26.12.2013,has held as under :-

“(M)(x)If the Special Civil Application isdescribedas one not only under Article 226 of the Constitution, but also under Article 227 of the Constitution of India and the Court or the Tribunal whose order is sought to be quashed,






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top