S.G.SHAH
DEEPAKBHAI AMBALAL SUTHAR – Appellant
Versus
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FORFEITED PROPERTIES – Respondent
1. The petitioner has challenged the order dated 20.03.2013 passed by the Appellate Tribunal for Forfeited Property, New Delhi, in MP20/BOM/2011 (Condonation of Delay) and prayed to quash and set aside the order dated 01.08.2008 passed by the Competent Authority, SAFEMA, Mumbai, whereby, residential house of the petitioner situated at House No.53B, Bansidhar Park Society, Naroda, Ahmedabad, is ordered to be forfeited. The petitioner has also prayed to quash and set aside the order of sealing of said house and all other consequent orders. Pursuant to the above referred orders and the property, the petitioner has also prayed to stay operation, implementation and execution of the above impugned orders during the pendency of this petition. However, Considering the issue regarding forfeiture of the property and concurrent findings of the two authorities, while hearing the matter for admission, both the sides have agreed to decide it finally so as to save repeated arguments initially for admission and for final hearing. Therefore, both the sides are heard for final hearing of the matter. Hence, Rule. Mr. K.T. Dave, learned counsel waives service of Rule.
2. The sum and substanc
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.