SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Guj) 52

JAYANT PATEL, C.L.SONI
LALJIBHAI BHIKHABHAI DHADUK & 2 – Appellant
Versus
TRUST OF THE TEMPLE OF SHREE LAXMINARAYAN DEV TEMPLE & 194 – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
MR ND NANAVATI, Ld. Sr. Counsel with MR BM MANGUKIYA, ADVOCATE for the Applicant(s) No. 1-3 MS BELA A PRAJAPATI, ADVOCATE for the Applicant(s) No. 1-3 MR HARSHEEL SHUKLA, AGP for the Opponent(s) No. 2-3 MR PG DESAI, Ld. Sr. Counsel with MR ASHISH H SHAH, ADVOCATE for the Opponent(s) No. 5 MR. UTPAL A JOSHI, ADVOCATE for the Opponent(s) No. 7 NOTICE SERVED BY DS for the Opponent(s) No. 12-13, 15 UNSERVED-REFUSED (N) for the Opponent(s) No. 14 MR BHUPENDRA J DWIDI, ADVOCATE for the Opponent(s) No. 67 MR C.B. UPADHYAYA, ADVOCATE for the Opponent(s) No. 2-3 MR MIHIR JOSHI, Ld. Sr. Counsel with MR MITUL K SHELAT, ADVOCATE for the Opponent(s) No. 8 MR SN SHELAT, Ld. Sr. Counsel with MR MRUGEN K PUROHIT, ADVOCATE for the Opponent(s) No. 1, 4, 6, 8-11 MR KM PATEL, Ld. Sr. Counsel with MR NIRAD D BUCH, ADVOCATE for the Opponent(s) No. 16-17, 19-69, 71-136 MR PJ KANABAR, ADVOCATE for the Opponent(s) No. 16-123 MR VH KANARA, ADVOCATE for the Opponent(s) No. 16-17, 19-66, 68-69, 71-123, 137-179 MR SHALIN MEHTA, Ld. Sr. Counsel with MR YASH N NANAVATY, ADVOCATE for the Opponent(s) No. 180-195

JUDGMENT

JAYANT PATEL, J.

1. It may be recorded that when Civil Application No. 13407 of 2014 had initially come up on Board, the learned Counsel appearing for both the sides had agreed to make submission for final disposal of MCA No. 3154 of 2009. Hence, we have finally heard MCA No. 3154 of 2009 as well as CA No. 31407 of 2014.

A BRIEF HISTORY

2. In the early part of 19th Century, the great Saint Swami Sahajanandji had founded the Swaminarayan Sect and had established a number of temples in India, most of which are located in Gujarat and the nearby areas. For the purpose of administration of these temples, he had divided India into two parts and had styled those two parts as Northern Diocese or Vibhagh and Southern Diocese. A line was drawn joining Jamnagar in the West with Calcutta in the East and the Northern portion of this line was known as Northern Vibhagh and Southern portion was known as Southern Vibhagh. For Northern Vibhagh, Swaminarayan Temple at Ahmedabad was designated by him as the main Deity or God and for Southern Vibhagh, he had designated the main Swaminarayan Temple at Vadtal as Principal Seat. He had prepared treaties known as “Deshvibhag-no-lekh”, wherein he had l






















































































































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top