Rajesh H. Shukla, J.

1. The present petition is filed by the petitioners under Arts. 14, 19(1)(e) and (g), 300A as well as 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India and also under the Bombay Land Revenue Code, 1879 read with Gujarat Land Revenue Rules, 1973 and also under the Gujarat Town Planning and Urban Development Act, 1976 (hereinafter referred to as "the Town Planning Act") for the prayer inter alia that appropriate writ, order or direction may be issued quashing and setting aside the impugned orders at Annexure-N, Annexure-O and Annexure-J and to restore the order passed by the Collector, Bhavnagar at Annexure-D dated 8-12-1971, on the grounds stated in the petition. The facts of the case briefly summarized are as follows.

2. The land bearing Survey No. 267, admeasuring 19 Acres 3 Gunthas i.e. 92323 sq. yards of village Vadva was owned and possessed by the petitioners. The predecessor-in-title of the petitioners applied to the Deputy Collector, Bhavnagar to get N.A. permission which was granted by order dated 27-12-1960. As per the relevant provisions of law regarding common plot the predecessor-in-title (ancestors of the petitioners) as erstwhile ruler was required to provide the common plot of 5% of the total area for the purpose of the development. The plots were made including the common plot and it was conveyed by separate conveyance deeds/registered sale-deeds executed on different dates in favour of the individuals. Those individuals then formed the Society-respondent No. 3 herein. It is the case of the petitioners that according to the relevant provisions of the Town Planning Act, the area of common plot remained 5% of the total area of the land. Therefore, late Shri Krishnakumarsinhji (the predecessor-in-title and the ancestor of the petitioners) was required to provide the open plot admeasuring 4619 sq. yards and out of this common plot admeasuring 4616 sq. yards was considered as a common plot provided for the plotting made for the respondent-Society. Thereafter, at the request made by the predecessor-in-title the construction was permitted in the area/plot admeasuring 8619 sq. yards and the plotting was made in the surplus area admeasuring 3220 sq. yards and the construction was made on 3220 sq. yards of the land as per the order at Annexure-D. However, the remaining land/plot was kept open for which the revenue dues were paid by the petitioners and it was shown throughout in the name of the petitioners and the City Mamlatdar, Bhavnagar issued the certificate dated 5-7-2000. However, when the Collector, Bhavnagar permitted the construction vide order at Annexure-D dated 8-12-1971 as per revised lay-out plan the respondent No. 3 raised an objection vide application at Annexure-H dated 24-3-1972. The order passed by respondent No. 3 negatived the conditions and it was not carried further. However, again application came to be made by respondent No. 3 on 2-11-1992 to the Collector, Bhavnagar for not granting the permission of sale or transact and/or for sanctioning of the plan. The said application was rejected by the Collector, Bhavnagar vide order dated 15-4-1972. Thereafter when the petitioners applied to the Bhavnagar Municipal Corporation ("B.M.C.") for sanction of the building plan, the B.M.C. refused to sanction the plan of the petitioners vide letter dated 12-1-2000 stating that the Collector has directed B.M.C. not to sanction the plan and/or not permit the petitioners to sale or transfer. It is contended that as the respondent No. 3 has failed in its attempt to establish its title to the land in question (open plot) and the petitioners were permitted to put up construction by the Collector, Bhavnagar vide order dated 8-12-1971 at Annexure-D, Regular Civil Suit No. 154 of 2000 is made by respondent No. 3 in the Court of Civil Judge (S.D.), Bhavnagar for cancellation of the order of the Collector, Bhavnagar dated 8-12-2007 and the application Exh. 5 for the interim relief is also filed and no orde