JAYANT M.PATEL, RAJESH H.SHUKLA
Manish Kanaiyalal Gupta – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat – Respondent
Jayant M. Patel, J.
1. As such, at the outset, we may record that all these matters are referred to the Division Bench of this Court under the orders passed by Hon'ble the Acting Chief Justice on administrative side for necessary direction/order, since the Hon'ble Single Judges of this Court on judicial side had made observation inter alia that the committee under Rule 31A of the Gujarat High Court Rules, 1993, (hereinafter referred to as the "Rules") had made observations about the use of the language of Gujarati though language of the Court is English and the certificate of competence issued by the Committee under Rule 31A of the Rules ignoring the language to be used in the court proceedings.
BACKGROUND:
2. In order to appreciate the necessity of direction or orders of the Division Bench, we may briefly refer to the background.
3. Criminal Revision Application No. 201/15 has been preferred in Gujarat Language by party-in-person Manish Kanaiyalal Gupta under section 397 read with section 401 of Cr.P.C. Against the order dated 17.03.2015 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge in Appeal No. 56/14. The application was made for certification of competency to assist the court by
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.