Abhilasha Kumari, J.

1. Rule. Mr. Y.C. Pandya, learned Advocate waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of respondent No. 1. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and with the consent of learned Counsel for the respective parties, the petition is being heard and finally decided. This petition under Art. 226 of the Constitution of India, has been preferred with the following prayers:

"9 (a) That Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction quashing and setting aside the impugned order/communication dated 2-4-2014 of the respondent authority and thereby direct the respondent to correct the date of birth of the petitioner as 1-11-1980 instead of 12-11-1980 in the register and her birth certificate issued by the respondent authority forthwith;

(b) Pending hearing and final disposal of this petition the Hon'ble Court may be pleased to quash and set aside the impugned order/communication dated 2-4-2014 and direct the respondent authority to correct the birth date of the petitioner as 1-11-1980 instead of 12-11-1980 mentioned in the birth certificate issued by the respondent;

(c) Such other and further reli