SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Guj) 405

K.S.JHAVERI, A.G.URAIZEE
GUNVANTLAL RATANCHAND SINCE DECEASED THRO HEIRS – Appellant
Versus
RAMESHBHAI PURSHOTTAMDAS PATEL – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
MR KS NANAVATI, SENIOR ADVOCATE WITH MR C G SHARMA, ADVOCATE for the Appellant(s) No. 1 - 1.4 , 2 - 3.3
MR KB UPADHYAY, ADVOCATE for the Respondent(s) No. 13
MR AJ PATEL, SENIOR ADVOCATE WITH MR SHITAL R PATEL, ADVOCATE for the Respondent(s) No. 1 - 4, 5.1 - 5.4, 6 – 7
MR MEHUL SHAH, ADVOCATE WITH MR SK PATEL, ADVOCATE for the Respondent(s) No. 14
NOTICE SERVED for the Respondent(s) No. 8.1
NOTICE SERVED BY DS for the Respondent(s) No. 12
RULE SERVED BY DS for the Respondent(s) No. 11
SERVED BY RPAD - (N) for the Respondent(s) No. 9, 10.2
UNSERVED-EXPIRED (N) for the Respondent(s) No. 8
UNSERVED-EXPIRED (R) for the Respondent(s) No.10.1

JUDGMENT :

MR.JUSTICE KS JHAVERI

1. We have heard learned Counsels appearing for the parties.

2. The appellant herein has challenged the order dated 13.09.2000 passed by the learned Single Judge in First Appeal No. 1879 of 1984 whereby the learned Single Judge confirmed the judgment of the trial court holding that the ratio laid down by the Division Bench is not applicable looking to the facts and circumstances of the case that one of the plots was in agricultural zone governed by the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act for which the Prant Officer had refused to grant permission for sale vide Ex. 87 dated 29.08.1972.2.The brief facts giving rise to this appeal are as follows:-

2.1 Two plots bearing Nos.236/2 and 234/2 admeasuring 7986 sq. yards are situated in village Bodakdev, Taluka Dascroi, District Ahmedabad. These plots were owned by Parshottam Babarbhai Patel. These plots were undivided joint hindu family property. Defendants Nos.1 to 4 and deceased Parshottamdas Babarbhai Patel executed an agreement to sell in favour of the defendants nos.8 to 12 on 29.11.1971. Twelve months' period was fixed for execution of the sale deed. Thus, the sale deed was to be executed by the de


























































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top