SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Guj) 514

M.R.SHAH, G.R.UDHWANI
Manjibhai Gandabhai – Appellant
Versus
Surendranagar Dist. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant:Farhana Y. Mansuri, Advocate

Judgment

M.R. Shah, J.

1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order passed by the learned Single Judge dated 10/03/2015 in Special Civil Application No. 10265/2007 by which the learned Single Judge has allowed the Special Civil Application preferred by the respondent-employer and has quashed and set aside the judgment and award passed by the learned Labour Court granting reinstatement and instead awarded lumpsum compensation quantified at Rs. 10,000/-, the appellants-original respondents-heirs and legal representatives have preferred the present Letters Patent Appeal. We have heard Ms. Farhana Mansuri, learned advocate appearing on behalf of the appellants. The original workman-daily wager worked only for 22 days with the respondent-District Panchayat. After a period of approximately 13 years from the date of his alleged termination, the workman raised an industrial dispute alleging breach of Section 25F and G of the Industrial Disputes Act raising industrial dispute through Reference (LCS) No. 310/1992. The learned Labour Court vide judgment and award dated 29/08/2002 allowed the said Reference and directed reinstatement with continuity and full backwag





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top