SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Guj) 545

S.H.VORA
Salim Allarakha Bhatti – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant:Bhavin S. Raiyani, Advocate
For the Respondents: Asmita Patel, AGP

Judgment

S.H. Vora, J.

1. Rule. Learned A.G.P. Ms. Asmita Patel waives service of Rule for the respondent - State.

2. With the consent of the learned advocates appearing for the respective parties, the present petition is taken up for final hearing today.

3. By way of this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner prays to issue writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to set aside the order of detention, if any, passed by the detaining authority against the petitioner under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 (for short, the 'Act') in exercise of powers under Sub-Section (2) of Section 3 of the Act.

4. The petitioner apprehends that the petitioner is likely to be detained under the Act on the pretext of F.I.Rs. being Prohibition C.R. No. 5188 of 2015 registered with Madhavpura police station for the offence punishable under Sections 66B, 65AE, 116(1)B and 81 of the Bombay Prohibition Act and Prohibition C.R. No. 5189 of 2015 registered with Madhavpura police station for the offence punishable under Sections 66B, 65AE, 116B and 81 of the Bombay Prohibition Act.

5. During the course of hearing, the State was di














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top