JAYANT M.PATEL, N.V.ANJARIA
Virendrasinh Mafaji Vaghela – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat – Respondent
Jayant M. Patel, J.
1. The petitioner No. 1, who is the Vice-President of Gandhinagar District Panchayat and petitioner No. 2, who is the Voter of Taluka Panchayat of Umrala in Bhavnagar District, have approached this Court by preferring this petition, inter alia, for the relief to declare the provisions of Clause (3) of Ordinance No. 2 of 2015 promulgated by the Governor of Gujarat as ultra vires Article 243E of the Constitution of India. Thereafter, additional prayers have been added by the draft amendment declaring Clauses (3), (4) and (5) of Ordinance No. 3 of 2015 promulgated by the Governor of Gujarat as ultra vires Article243E and Article 243U(3) of the Constitution of India. The petitioners have also prayed to issue appropriate writ of mandamus, directing the State Election Commission to declare the date of holding elections of Panchayats in the State of Gujarat forthwith in due compliance of the constitutional obligation flowing from Article 243E of the Constitution of India read with the provisions of Section 13 of the Gujarat Panchayats Act (hereinafter re
Rasikchandra Devshanker Acharya & Ors. v. State of Gujarat & Ors.
State of Maharashtra and Ors. v. Jalgaon Municipal Council and Ors.
Bhanumati and Ors. V. State of U.P., through its Principal Secretary and Ors.
Kishansingh Tomar v. Municipal Corporation of City of Ahmedabad and Ors.
T.N. Sheshan, Chief Election Commissioner of India v. Union of India and Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.