S.R.BRAHMBHATT
Rajendrakumar Govindlal Raval – Appellant
Versus
Executive Engineer – Respondent
S.R. Brahmbhatt, J.
1. Heard learned Counsels appearing for the parties. The applicant, who happens to be respondent No.1 in Spl.C.A. No. 10929 of 2014, has taken out this application for following prayers:
(a) That the Hon'ble Court be pleased to direct the opponent company to pay full wages to the applicant from 23-12-2013 till today;
(b) That the Hon'ble Court be pleased to hear this application before the main matter as there is non-compliance of the order dated 5-7-2014 of the Industrial Tribunal pending the hearing of the Special Civil Application No. 10929 of 2014;
(c) for costs;
(d) For such other and further reliefs as the circumstance of the case may require.
Thus, what is essentially prayed for is the direction to the original petitioner-employer for paying full wages to the applicant, as the order of termination which was subject-matter of approval, has not been effective on account of non-granting of approval, which is subject-matter of challenge in the main matter.
Facts in brief, as could be gathered from the Civil Application as well as main petition, would indicate that the applicant's services came to be terminated vide order dated 23-12-2013 pursuant to departme
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.