JAYANT M.PATEL, J.B.PARDIWALA, PARESH UPADHYAY
Bhavsar Urmiben Kanaiyalal – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat – Respondent
Paresh Upadhyay, J.
1. The point for consideration before this specially constituted Bench is as to whether the Gujarat State Social Welfare Board is a 'State' within the meaning of Article 12 of the Constitution of India. Reference is made to this Bench by the Division Bench of this Court vide order dated 18.07.2014. Since it is the question noted above, which only needs to be answered by this Bench, the merits of the petition, which is dismissed by the learned single Judge on the ground of that being not maintainable, need not be gone into and therefore whether to grant any relief to the petitioners would be left to the Division Bench which is seized of the Letters Patent Appeal, however, for the limited purpose, as to under what circumstances the reference is made, the following aspects are noted.
2.1 The petitioners, who are working with the Gujarat State Social Welfare Board, asked for uniform implementation of the Government Resolution dated 13.03.1995, for all the employees, by which higher pay-scale is ordered to be given to the employees of the Gujarat State Social Welfare Board. The same was granted to some of the persons and is denied to some other persons. Under t
P.K. Khalsa v. Gujarat State Social Welfare Advisory Board & another
Zee Telefilms Limited v. Union of India
Ramana Dayaram Shetty v. The International Airport Authority of India
Sukhdev v. Bhagatram (1975) 3 SCR 619 at p.658 = AIR 1975 SC 1331
Kapila Hingorani v. State of Bihar
Steel Authority of India v. National Union Waterfront Workers
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.