RAVI R.TRIPATHI, SONIA GOKANI
SADIKBHAI IDRASHBAHI KHATRI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
(Ms. JUSTICE SONIA GOKANI)
1. All these appeals arise from the judgment and order of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, 3rd Fast Track Court, Bharuch rendered in Sessions Case No. 148 of 2003 on 26th August 2004, whereby, the original accused nos. 1 to 3 [hereinafter to be referred to “A1 to A3”] have been convicted under sections 392 and 394 read with section 114 of the Indian Penal Code [“IPC” for short] and sentenced to serve rigorous imprisonment for a period of four years and pay fine of Rs. 2,000/= each; and in default of payment of fine, to undergo further imprisonment for a period of six months. Although, all these accused have been given benefit of doubt and have been acquitted of the offences punishable under sections 397 and 120B IPC. Whereas, accused no. 4 has been given benefit of doubt of all the offences viz., sections 392, 394 read with Section 114, 397 & 120B IPC and sub-section (1) of Section 135 of the Bombay Police Act.
2. Aggrieved accused have preferred Criminal Appeal under section 374 CrPC challenging the judgment and order of conviction passed by the Court where Criminal Appeals No. 1435 of 2004; 1661 of 2004 and 1713 of 2004 are respectively pr
Abbas Hasam Ghanchi v. State of Gujarat
Lalita Kumar v. State of Uttar Pradesh
Musheer Khan @ Badshah Khan & Anr. v. State of Madhya Pradesh, AIR 2010 SC 762
Mohanlal @ Munno Usmanbhai Chauhan
Patai alias Krishna Kumar v. State of Uttar Pradesh
Ramsinh Bavaji Jadeja v. State
Rumi Bora Dutta v. State of Assam
State of Gujarat vs. Mohanlal @ Munno Usmanbhai Chauhan
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.