SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Guj) 838

S.GSHAH
Geetaben – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant:Ashish M. Dagli, Advocate
For the Respondents: Manan Mehta, AGP

JUDGMENT

S.G. Shah, J.

1. Perused the petition, materials supplied to the detenu, detention order and heard learned counsel for the parties.

1.1 The respondent - State has not filed affidavit-in-reply. Therefore, averments and contentions raised in the petition remains unchallenged and un-controverted.

2. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is directed against the order of detention dated 28.9.2015 passed by the respondent authority in exercise of powers conferred under Section 3(2) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti Social Activities Act, 1985 (for short the Act) by detaining the detenue as a "bootlegger" as defined under Section 2(b) of the Act.

3. Learned advocate for the detenue submits that order of detention impugned in this petition deserves to be quashed and set aside on the ground that one offence registered against the detenu before the concerned police station vide III C.R. No. 550 of 2015 for the offences punishable under Sections 66(1)(b), 65(e) etc. of Prohibition Act is not of such magnitude and intensity as to have the effect of disturbing the public order so as to pass an order under Section 3(1) of the PASA Act. Learned advocate for the petition













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top