K.M. Thaker, J.

1. Heard Mr. Gogia, learned advocate for the petitioner sangh. Though served, no one has appeared for respondent No. 2. So far as respondent No. 1 is concerned, the cause list reflects that respondent No. 1 chose to appear as party-in-person, however, respondent No. 1 is also not present when the petition is called out and taken up for hearing.

2. This petition was listed for hearing on 18.1.2016, however, since no one attended the hearing on behalf of the respondents, hearing was adjourned to 28.1.2016 with a view to granting opportunity to the respondents. On 28.1.2016 also the Court considered it appropriate to grant one more opportunity to the respondents and therefore, hearing was adjourned today. However, today also no one is present on behalf of respondent No. 1 and on behalf of respondent No. 2 as well.

3. Learned advocate for the petitioner sangh submitted that so far as respondent No. 2 is concerned, he did not attend the hearing even before the learned Labour Court and he did not lead any evidence before the learned Labour Court and during admission hearing of this petition also he had not appeared.

4. In present petition, the petitioner sangh has c