N.V.ANJARIA
Vasava Virsing Himatbhai – Appellant
Versus
Indian Oil Corporation – Respondent
N.V. Anjaria, J.
1. As the learned advocates appearing for all the parties requested and consented, the petition was taken up for final consideration.
1.1 Therefore, Rule returnable forthwith. Learned advocate Mrs. Mauna Bhatt waives rule on behalf of respondent No. 1. Learned advocate Ms. Lilu Bhaya waives rule on behalf of respondent Nos. 2 to 5, whereas learned advocate Mr. Pravin Gondaliya waives rule on behalf of respondent No. 6.
2. The petitioner is aggrieved by order dated 28.01.2015 and the decision reflected therein of the respondent-Paschim Gujarat Vij Company Limited, whereby the Vij Company refused to restore electricity supply to the petitioner. A declaration is also prayed for that the action of the respondent-Vij Company in disconnecting power supply is illegal.
2.1 The premises at which the petitioner is desirous to have electricity supply restored is revenue survey No. 537-P admeasuring 1 Guntha at Lathi, District Amreli, being the place of petrol pump run by the petitioner upon a dealership for the same granted by respondent No. 1-Indian Oil Corporation on 16.11.2010. Refusal to restore the connection by the Vij Company is on the ground that respondent No.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.