R.M. Chhaya, J.

1. Heard Mr. Jal S. Unwala, learned advocate with Ms. Tejal Vashi, learned advocate for the petitioner, Ms. Manisha L. Shah, learned advocate for respondent No. 1 and Ms. Mamta Vyas, learned advocate for respondent No. 2.

2. By way of this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:--

"(A) To hold and declare that the complaint at Annexure-C to the present petition made by the respondent No. 2 against the present petitioner is not maintainable before the respondent No. 1 herein in view of the provisions of Gujarat Lokayukta Act, 1986 and be further pleased to hold and declare that the respondent No. 1 herein has no jurisdiction, powers or authority in the facts and circumstances of the present case to entertain the complaint of the respondent No. 2 herein against the present petitioner which is at Annexure-C to the present petition and thereby be pleased to quash and set aside the impugned complaint at Annexure-C dated 16-3-2015 against the present petitioner;

(B) To quash and set aside the order dated 30-9-2015 passed by the respondent No. 1 herein which is communicated to the petitioner by way