SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Guj) 973

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
N.V. Anjaria, J.
Rameshbhai Ramajibhai Desai – Appellant
Vs.
State of Gujarat and Others – Respondents
Special Civil Application No. 15687 of 2014
Decided On : 27-7-2015

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Vijay H. Nangesh.
For the Respondent: Manan Mehta, A.G.P.

Important Point-Petitioner has to approach Revisional Court against order passed under Section 29 of Domestic Violence Act.

Headnote:Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005-Section 29-Criminal Procedure Code, 1973-Section 397(1) read with Section 401-Remedy against appellate order-Court of Magistrate or Court of Session under Domestic Violence Act are Courts which exist and function under Cr. P.C.-They are vested with full-fledged adjudicatory as well as procedural powers under Cr. P.C.-Their functioning is not in a limited role-Neither Magistrate of First Class, nor Court of Session under Domestic Violence Act are persona designate-Proper remedy against impugned judgment and order being of filing of Criminal Revision Application under Section 397(1) read with Section 401 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, writ jurisdiction of High Court by filing petition under Article 226 of Constitution to set aside impugned judgment and order could not have been invoked-Petitioner has to approach Revisional Court availing remedy of Revision Application.

       Result-Special Civil Application dismissed.

       

JUDGMENT :

N.V. Anjaria, J.

1. The petitioner has invoked writ jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution against the judgment and order of Court of Session in Criminal Appeal, which was preferred under Section 29 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. The said appeal was against the order passed by learned Metropolitan Magistrate. What is prayed for is a writ of certiorari to get the said judgment and order in Criminal Appeal set aside. The following questions arise for consideration:-

(i) Whether against the judgment and order deciding an appeal by Court of Session under Section 29 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, a remedy of revision application under Section 397(1) read with Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 is available?

(ii) Whether, because of what is held by this Court in Narendrakumar @ Nitinkumar Manilal Shah vs. State of Gujarat, 2014 (2) GLR 1353, a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, is the remedy to challenge judgment and order in appeal decided under Section 29 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005?

(iii) Whether the Judicial Magistrate and Court of Session exercising their powers under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 are the Courts as per the hierarchy of class of Criminal Courts under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and can be subjected to the revisional jurisdiction of the High Court under the provisions of the Cr. P.C?

(iv) Whether on the premise and reasoning that the relief available under the provisions of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 are civil in nature, the provisions of the Act exclude the machinery of hierarchy of Courts under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, thereby ruling out amenability of judgment of Court of Session under Section 29 of the Act to the revisional jurisdiction of the High Court under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973?

(v) If the remedy of tiling revision application under Section 397(1) read with Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 is available, whether against the impugned judgment and order, writ jurisdiction for issuance of writ of certiorari should be allowed to be maintained?

2. The basic facts, leaving aside unnecessary details, may be set out. Respondent No. 2-wife initiated proceedings against the petitioner-husband and others under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, by filing Misc. Criminal Application No. 18 of 2002 under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. In her case before learned Metropolitan Magistrate, Court No. 2, Ahmedabad, respondent No. 2 stated that her marriage was solemnized with the petitioner and after the marriage, her matrimonial life went on smoothly in the beginning, but thereafter, the husband and the in-laws started harassing her. Out of the wedlock four children were born. In the application, the wife made various allegations regarding mental and physical harassment, detailing of which is not necessary herein. The wife filed criminal complaint against the husband and other family members for the offences under Sections 498-A, 323, 506(2), 114 and for the offence under the Dowry Prohibition Act. The relief prayed by the applicant-wife in her application included protection orders, claim for maintenance, amount of rent for residential accommodation, claim for monetary relief and payment of compensation, being the relief under Sections 18, 20 and 22 of the Act. The petitioner-husband filed reply and contested.

2.1. Learned Magistrate passed order below Exh. 1A granting interim maintenance of Rs. 6,000/- per month. By order dated 15th December, 2012, learned Metropolitan Magistrate decided the application of respondent-wife finally, and passed orders granting protection against acts of domestic violence under Section 18, issued residence orders and alternative direction for rent if the accommodation for















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top