SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Guj) 981

M.R.SHAH, A.J.SHASTRI
State of Gujarat – Appellant
Versus
Ravubha Anadubha Parmar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Rakesh Patel, A.P.P.
For the Respondents:Amrita Ajmera, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

M.R. Shah, J.

1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge and Fast Track Court No. 2, Surendranagar in Sessions Case Nos. 100/2000 and 29/2001 dated 17/10/2006, by which the learned trial court has acquitted all the chargesheeted accused for the offences punishable under sections 489(a), (b), (c), 120B and 201 of Indian Penal Code, the State has preferred both these Criminal Appeals.

2. The case of the prosecution, in nutshell, is as under:-

2.01. An offence being C.R. No. 1-54/2000 came to be registered before Muli Police Station against the respondents - accused for the offences punishable under sections 489(a), (b), (c), 120B and 201 of Indian Penal Code. The complainant viz. Pramodkumar Ramanlal Dave, who was discharging his duty as Manager in the State Bank of Saurashtra, Muli Branch, at the relevant time, had lodged the aforesaid First Information Report before Muli Police Station on 16/06/2000 at about 11.00 regarding the incident alleged to have been taken place on 12/6/2000 alleging i























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top