SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Guj) 998

S.G.SHAH
Gujarat Dairy Development Corporation Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Shardaben – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :K.M. Patel, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

S.G. Shah, J.

1. The appellants are original respondents No. 2 and 4 being owner of the vehicle involved in the road accident. Respondents No. 1 to 7 are original claimants; whereas, respondent No. 8 is driver of the vehicle owned by the appellants and respondent No. 9 is insurer of such vehicle. They are hereinafter referred in their original capacity before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Ahmedabad (Rural) in their respective Motor Accident Claim Petitions. M.A.C.P. No. 338 of 1989 was filed by legal heirs and dependents of the victim of the road accident, namely, Kantilal Keshabhai, whereas M.A.C.P. No. 331 of 1989 was filed by the parents of the victim of the same accident, namely, Dasrathbhai Mohanbhai. Since both the victims had died in the same vehicular accident, the Tribunal has decided their claim petition by common consolidated impugned judgment and award dated 18.4.1992, whereby, claimant of M.A.C.P. No. 338 of 1989 were awarded Rs. 7,92,000/- as compensation for the death of Kantilal Keshavbhai with 12% interest and cost throughout, whereas claimants o


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top