SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Guj) 1001

M.R.SHAH, A.J.SHASTRI
State of Gujarat – Appellant
Versus
Parbatsinh Dhulsinh Chauhan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Nisha Thakore, APP
For the Respondents:Manoj T. Danak, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

M.R. Shah, J.

1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgement and order of acquittal passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge and Fast Track Court No. 1, Sabarkantha at Himmatnagar (hereinafter referred to as "the learned trial court" for short) in Sessions Case No. 43 of 2008, by which the learned trial court has acquitted the accused for the offences punishable under sections 302, 307,498A and 504 of Indian Penal Code, the State has preferred present Criminal Appeal.

2. The case of the prosecution, in nutshell, is as under:--

"That one Lalsinh Parbatsinh Chauhah, son of the deceased as well as the son of the original accused lodged a complaint with Himmatnagar Town Police Station against the original accused for the offences punishable under sections 302, 307, 498A and 504 of Indian Penal Code, which was registered as First Information Report being CR No. I-389 of 2007. It was the case on behalf of the prosecution and the original complainant that the original accused was physically and mentally harassing the deceased - wife of the accused, and



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top