G.B. Shah, J.

1. Heard Mr. S.K. Bagga, learned advocate for the applicants and Mr. K.L. Pandya, learned APP for the respondent-State.

2. The present Criminal Revision Application is filed challenging the order dated 2/4/2016 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, City Sessions Court, Ahmedabad, in Sessions Case No. 376 of 2014 below application Exh. 6 rejecting the said application preferred by the applicants herein under section 173(8) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as "Cr.P.C." for short) for further investigation in respect of the offence alleged against the present applicants. After proceeding with the submissions, learned advocate for the applicants, producing an affidavit affirmed by himself, has submitted that as such, all the applicants-original accused are in judicial custody and therefore, he, upon instructions received from one Mr. Rakesh Mulchand Dayani, who is nephew of present applicant No. 1-original accused No. 1, has filed this affidavit and now he is restricting his submissions so far as point/ground No. 7 of the application at Exh. 6 is concerned and right now, he does not press the present Criminal Revision Applic