SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Guj) 1590

S.G.SHAH
Renukaben Rameshchandra Kayasth – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :A.D. Shah, Advocate
For the Respondents: Manan Mehta, APP

JUDGMENT :

S.G. Shah, J.

1. Heard Ld. Advocate Mr. A.D. Shah for the appellant and Ld. A.P.P. Mr. Manan Mehta for the respondent State. The appellant has challenged the judgment and order dated 29th March, 1999 of his conviction u/s. 7, 13 (1) (d) read with section 13 (2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act. By such impugned judgment, the Special Judge of Ahmedabad City has awarded the sentence of Rigorous Imprisonment of Six months and to pay fine of Rs. 1,000/- and default to undergo further Rigorous Imprisonment for 15 days for the offence punishable u/s. 7 of the Act and Rigorous Imprisonment of one year with fine of Rs. 1,000/- and in default to undergo further Rigorous Imprisonment for 15 days for the offences punishable u/s. 13 (1) (d) and 13 of the Act.

2. The sum and substance of the prosecution case is to the effect that, the complainant Navinbhai Hargovinddas Patel who was carrying on business of manufacturing of stapler pins wanted financial assistance in the form of loan facility from the Gujarat State Financial Corporation in addition to existing loan of Rs. 49,000




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top