S.G.SHAH
Renukaben Rameshchandra Kayasth – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat – Respondent
S.G. Shah, J.
1. Heard Ld. Advocate Mr. A.D. Shah for the appellant and Ld. A.P.P. Mr. Manan Mehta for the respondent State. The appellant has challenged the judgment and order dated 29th March, 1999 of his conviction u/s. 7, 13 (1) (d) read with section 13 (2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act. By such impugned judgment, the Special Judge of Ahmedabad City has awarded the sentence of Rigorous Imprisonment of Six months and to pay fine of Rs. 1,000/- and default to undergo further Rigorous Imprisonment for 15 days for the offence punishable u/s. 7 of the Act and Rigorous Imprisonment of one year with fine of Rs. 1,000/- and in default to undergo further Rigorous Imprisonment for 15 days for the offences punishable u/s. 13 (1) (d) and 13 of the Act.
2. The sum and substance of the prosecution case is to the effect that, the complainant Navinbhai Hargovinddas Patel who was carrying on business of manufacturing of stapler pins wanted financial assistance in the form of loan facility from the Gujarat State Financial Corporation in addition to existing loan of Rs. 49,000
Arjunlal M. Upadhyaya v. State of Gujarat reported in 2010 (3) GLR 2469
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.