SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Guj) 1375

K.M.THAKER
Kalyani Roshanali Abdulla – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Jayraj Chauhan, Advocate
For the Respondents: Megha Chitaliya, A.G.P.

JUDGMENT :

K.M. Thaker, J.

1. Heard Mr. Chauhan, learned advocate for the petitioner and Mr. Mankad, learned advocate for the respondent and Ms. Megha Chitaliya, learned AGP.

2. In present petition the petitioner has prayed, inter alia, that:-

"24(A) YOUR LORDSHIPS may be pleased to direct the respondents to release the principal amount of gratuity to the tune of Rs. 1,38,979/- and interest at the rate of 18% from due date till its actual realization and 18% interest on the delayed payment of the principal amount being 1,86,615/- for 1 year and 2 1/2 months, which as due and payable on 1.8.2007."

3. So far as relevant facts are concerned, the petitioner has averred and stated that:-

"2. The petitioner by way of this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, begs to challenge the inaction on the part of the respondents in not releasing the due payment towards remaining gratuity and interest accrued thereon which was due and payable to the petitioner on 1.8.2007 to the tune of Rs. 2,94,217/- out of said amount part payment of Rs. 1,80,615/- was made on 16.10.2008, intere































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top