J.B.PARDIWALA
AJIT ANNU KAMATH – Appellant
Versus
DEPUTY DIRECTOR – Respondent
J.B. PARDIWALA, J.
1. By this writ application, the applicant an accused of a complaint under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (for short, ‘the P.M.L.A.’), has prayed for the following relief:
“13(A) That the Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction for setting aside the conditions imposed by Ld. Sessions Judge, Ahmedabad while issuing summons vide order, dated 18-07-2014 on the receipt of the complaint filed by respondent no.1 herein which came to be registered as PMLA complaint No.3 of 2014, in view of peculiar facts and circumstances of the case stated above; or (B) That any just and proper order may be passed.”
2. It is the case of the applicant that he is engaged in the business of manufacturing Pharmaceutical ingredients. The company manufactures bulk drugs which includes the life saving drugs for the treatment of Cancer. A complaint was received by the Crime Branch, Surat from the ICICI Bank against one M/s. R.A. Distributors Private Limited and its directors alleging that the firm had prepared seventeen fake bills of entries and the same were presented before the ICICI Bank for the outward remittance. The District Crim
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.