SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Guj) 53

S.G.SHAH
Deepakbhai Hargovindbhai Mewada – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : S.J. Gaekwad
For the Respondents: Amita Shah

JUDGMENT :

S.G. Shah, J.

1. Heard learned advocate Mr. S.J. Gaekwad for the petitioner and learned AGP Ms. Amita Shah for the respondents. Perused the record.

2. The undisputed fact between the parties can be summarised as under:-

2.1 The petitioner was working as a Sr. Town Planner and In-charge Chief Architect & Town Planner in the office of Chief Architect & Town Planner in the Roads and Building Department, Government of Gujarat at Gandhinagar. Since there is combined charge-sheet against other Officers under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 ('Act', for short) their names and details are material. Mrs. Ramilaben Vinodkumar Patel was working as Assistant Town Planner whereas Kanubhai Jayantilal Gajjar was working as Surveyor in the same office with the petitioner. On 27.11.2003, one Vikrambhai Shantilal Chauhan, Consulting Civil Engineer submitted two applications along with proposed plans and necessary papers in the office of the petitioner for obtaining completion/occupancy certificate in respect of construction made on plots Nos. 776 and 777 situated in Sector 21, at Gandhinagar. However, those two plots were confiscated by the Government for breach of conditions of allotment o




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top