SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Guj) 171

M.R.SHAH, B.N.KARIA
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax – Appellant
Versus
Devangi – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : Manish Bhatt and Mauna M. Bhatt.
For the Respondents: S.N. Soparkar and B.S. Soparkar.

JUDGMENT :

M.R. Shah, J.

1. As common question of law and facts arise in this group of appeals, they are disposed of by this common judgment and order.

2. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned common judgment and order passed by the learned Income Tax Appellate Tribunal "C" Bench, Ahmedabad, passed in IT (SS) A Nos. 138 to 141/AHD/2011 for AY 2001-02 to 2004-05, by which, the learned Tribunal has allowed the said appeals and has directed to AO to delete the addition made under Section 153 A of the Act for AY 2000-01 to 2004-05, the Revenue has preferred present Appeals with the following proposed questions of law.

"A. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal is correct in narrowing down the scope of assessment u/s. 153 A in respect of completed assessments by holding that only undisclosed income and undisclosed assets detected during the search could be brought to tax?

B. Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal is correct in law in holding that the scope of Section 153 A is limited to assessing only search related income, thereby denying Revenue the opportunity of taxing other escaped incom

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top