S.G. Shah, J.

1. Heard learned advocate Mr. P.P. Majmudar for the petitioner and learned AGP Ms. Amita Shah for the respondent No. 1. Perused the record. In compliance of order dated 2.12.2016 and 29.12.2016, learned AGP is producing letter dated 23.1.2017 received by her from the office of the Superintendent of Police, Rajkot (Rural), with two tabular statements, which are to be taken on record. Such statements contain comparative details of several employees of the respondents, who were also involved in similar charges under the Prohibition Act.

2. The petitioner has sought indulgence under Articles 14, 16 and 226 of the Constitution of India for quashing and setting aside the impugned order dated 29.8.2003 by the Superintendent of Police, Rajkot (Rural), so also order dated 30.12.2003 by the Special D.I.G., Rajkot Division, Rajkot whereby punishment of removal from service has been imposed upon the petitioner by the Superintendent of Police and such order of removal has been confirmed in appeal by order dated 30.12.2003. Therefore, petitioner has been terminated from the services of the respondents w.e.f. 30.12.2003. It seems that petitioner has also challenged such orde