SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Guj) 2078

G.B.SHAH
BHAGHAJI JORAJI THAKORE – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :MR J.S. YADAV, ADVOCATE
For the Respondent: MS R.P. CHANDARANA, APP

JUDGMENT :

1. As these five appeals arise out of the same judgment and order, with the consent of learned advocates appearing for the respective parties, they were heard together and are being decided by this common judgment.

2. These appeals arise out of the same judgment and order dated 1.7.2000 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Rajkot, in Sessions Case No.190 of 1998 whereby the present appellantsoriginal accused were convicted and sentenced to undergo SI for seven years with fine of Rs.5,000/- each, in default, to suffer further RI for six months for the offence punishable under section 395 of Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as “IPC” for short). Criminal Appeal No.678 of 2000 has been filed by original accused Nos.2,3,7 and 8, Criminal Appeal No.801 of 2000 has been filed by original accused No.1, Criminal Appeal No.853 of 2000 has been filed by original accused No.4, Criminal Appeal No.859 of 2000 has been filed by original accused No.6 and Criminal Appeal No.918 of 2000 has been filed by original accused No.5.

3. Short facts of the case of the prose








































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top