SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Guj) 801

J.B.PARDIWALA
Phanugorn Poo-IM – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : V.D. Nanavati, Anuja S. Nanavati
For the Respondents: Shruti Pathak

JUDGMENT :

J.B. Pardiwala, J.

1. Rule returnable forthwith. Ms. Pathak, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor waives service of notice of rule for and on behalf of the respondents.

2. By this application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the applicant, a Thai National, seeks to invoke the inherent powers of this Court, praying for quashing of the First Information Report bearing C.R. No. II-231 of 2016 dated 20th July 2016 registered with the Waghodiya Police Station, District: Vadodara Rural for the offence punishable under Section 14(b) and (c) of the Foreigners Act, 1946 (for short, "the Act, 1946").

3. The facts giving rise to this application may be summarised as under:

3.1. The applicant herein is a 'Thai National'. He is working with the 'Apollo Tyres' at Limda, Taluka: Waghodiya, District: Vadodara, as a Marking Manager for the ASEAN region. It is the case of the prosecution that the applicant herein visited India on 4th January 2016 on a tourist visa and attended a business meeting at the factory of 'Apollo Tyres' situated at Limda, Taluka: Waghodiya, District: Vadodara. It is the case of the prosecution that the applicant stayed in a hotel by name '





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top