SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Guj) 794

J.B.PARDIWALA
Sureshbhai Narsinhbhai Parsana – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : K.S. Chandrani
For the Respondents: Pathak, Addl. Public Prosecutor

JUDGMENT :

J.B. Pardiwala, J.

1. Rule returnable forthwith. Ms. Pathak, the learned APP, waives service of notice of rule for and on behalf of the respondent No. 1-State and Mr. Suren B. Patel, the learned counsel, waives service of notice of rule for and on behalf of the respondent No. 2.

2. By this application under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the applicant-original accused seeks to invoke the inherent powers of this Court praying for quashing of the proceedings of the Criminal Case No. 6412 of 2015 filed in the court of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rajkot arising from a complaint filed under section 138 of the N.I. Act for the dishonour of the cheque.

3. Mr. Chandrani, the learned counsel appearing for the applicant invited my attention to the averments made in para-2 of the complaint. It appears that according to the averments made in the complaint, the applicant herein borrowed an amount of Rs. 16,50,000/- from the complainant as he wanted to purchase a parcel of land. This amount was borrowed by the applicant from the complainant way back on 3rd November, 2008. To discharge this liability, the cheque in question dated 14th May, 2015 was drawn by


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top