RAJESH H.SHUKLA
Vinod Keshavji Nanda – Appellant
Versus
Anjana Ajitsinh – Respondent
Rajesh H. Shukla, J.
1. The present Civil Application is filed by the applicants-third party to be pleaded as party respondents in main matter being First Appeal No. 1313 of 1985 on the grounds stated in the application inter alia that the applicants have stepped in the shoes of the original respondent Nos. 10 to 21 and, therefore, they have right title interest in the suit property and are therefore interested in the outcome of the Appeal, which would directly affect their interest.
2. The background of the facts is that the aforesaid First Appeal No. 1313/1985 with Civil Application No. 2350/1991 came to be preferred by the original appellants-respondent Nos. 1 to 9 for the prayer to restrain the original respondents in the First Appeal from selling and alienating the suit property pending First Appeal. Reliance is placed on the order of the Hon'ble Division Bench of the High Court (Comam: B.S. Kapadia & K.J. Vaidya, JJ.) dated 27.09.1991, where Civil Application was partly allowed filed by the original appellants restraining the present respondent Nos. 20 to 27 from alienating or transferring their share in the suit property observing that as per the judgment of the tria
Amit Kumar Shaw & Anr. Vs. Farida Khatoon & Anr.
Dhanalakshmi & Ors. Vs. P. Mohan & Ors.
Dhurandhar Prasad Singh Vs. Jai Prakash University
Kenchegowda (since deceased) by Legal Representatives Vs. Siddegowda @ Motegowda
Parbati Devi Vs. Purana Patra & Ors.
R. Mahalakshmi Vs. A.V. Anantharaman & Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.