IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
S.R. Brahmbhatt and A.J. Shastri, JJ.
Ajim Yusufbhai Suryamemon - Appellants
Vs.
State of Gujarat - Respondent
Criminal Appeal (Against Conviction) No. 280 of 2015
Decided On : 07-04-2017
Gujarat Police Act - Section 135(1) – Indian Penal Code, 1860 – Section 302 – Offence of Murder – Original accused was convicted and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life and to pay a fine – On account of dispute between the appellant accused and the complainant side, though Shoeb and the appellant-accused were good friends, the accused was demanding the amount from Shoeb. As per the case of prosecution, as the appellant has picked up a quarrel with Shoeb in connection with the monetary dispute resulting in scuffle, a complaint came to be filed before Pradhyuman Nagar Police Station by appellant accused Ajim against Shoeb alleging infliction of a knife injury, but from that day onwards, strained relations existed between the appellant and the complainant. It is further the case of the prosecution that thereafter, appellant accused Ajim used to administer threat time and again to Shoeb and his brother – Held, evidence and the circumstances are sufficient enough to suggest that a serious doubt is emerging from the record which benefit must lean in favour of the appellant accused and accordingly, in the background of such suspicious circumstances, we are unable to affirm the view of the trial court whereby an order of conviction is passed and therefore, we deem it proper in our considered opinion to set aside judgment and order of conviction and to allow the appeal filed by the appellant accused – Compared medical evidence with oral evidence as well and by applying the rule of careful scrutiny of interested witnesses, we are of the considered opinion that the case put up by the prosecution is based upon a very weak piece of evidence upon which, no ultimate conclusion of guilt of the accused is possible to be established beyond reasonable doubt and accordingly, the conviction based upon such piece of evidence appears to be unsustainable – Appeal Allowed
A.J. Shastri, J.
1. The present Criminal Appeal is filed by the appellant-original accused under section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ('Cr.P.C.' for short) against the judgment and order dated 23.1.2015 passed in Sessions Case No. 37 of 2012 by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Jamnagar, whereby original accused was convicted and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs. 5000/- and in default of payment of fine, to undergo further simple imprisonment for six months for the offence punishable under section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and also ordered to undergo simple imprisonment for three months for the offence punishable under section 135(1) of Gujarat Police Act. Both these sentences were ordered to run concurrently. The accused was given set off for the period already undergone in jail.
2. The brief facts of the case are that on account of dispute between the appellant accused and the complainant side, though Shoeb and the appellant-accused were good friends, the accused was demanding the amount from Shoeb. As per the case of prosecution, as the appellant has picked up a quarrel with Shoeb in connection with the monetary dispute resulting in scuffle, a complaint came to be filed before Pradhyuman Nagar Police Station by appellant accused Ajim against Shoeb alleging infliction of a knife injury, but from that day onwards, strained relations existed between the appellant and the complainant. It is further the case of the prosecution that thereafter, appellant accused Ajim used to administer threat time and again to Shoeb and his brother.
2.1 The prosecution case has further travelled by asserting that on 25.11.2011 at about 11 p.m. to 11.15 p.m., Shoeb Gafar received a telephonic message from one Imran Iqbal Banani informing that his brother Imran had been inflicted a knife blow by somebody near Mohammadbhai's Lati on road and is lying in bleeding condition. It is further the case of the prosecution that Imran Banani informed Shoeb Gafar that they are taking Imran, the victim, to the Government hospital in Cruiser car of Riyas Iqbalbhai Parekh and he was informed to come down to the Government Hospital. Pursuant to that, at about 11.45 p.m., the complainant Shoeb Gafar went to the Government Hospital where he saw his brother in a bleeding condition with sharp cutting wound on his neck and the doctor pronounced him dead. This incident in question was registered as a complaint before Kalavad Police Station being C.R. No. 182 of 2011 for the offence punishable under section 302 of IPC read with section 135 of Bombay Police Act. After registering the complaint, the Investigating Officer has conducted investigation and the appellant accused came to be arrested on 4.12.2011. Investigating Officer has recorded statements of relevant witnesses, drawn panchnama of scene of offence, executed arrest panchnama, collected muddamal articles and sent the body to FSL for further examination and for performing post mortem. After collecting every particulars during the course of investigation, a detailed charge sheet came to be submitted on 18.2.2012 against the appellant accused in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Kalavad, for the offence punishable under section 302 of IPC read with section 135(1) of Gujarat Police Act.
2.2 As the criminal case, which came to be registered, is triable by the Court of Sessions, in exercise of power under section 209 of Cr.P.C., learned Judicial Magistrate First Class was pleased to commit the case to the Court of Sessions and the same was then registered as Sessions Case No. 37 of 2012 which has come up for consideration before the learned 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Jamnagar.
2.3 Record indicates that pursuant to committal of the case, a charge came to be framed vide Exh. 11 which was read over to the appellant accused
Bodhraj alias Bodha and others vs. State of Jammu and Kashmir
Chandrappa & Ors. vs. State of Karnataka
Chacko alias Aniyan Kunju and others vs. State of Kerala reported in AIR 2004 SC 2688
Darbara Singh vs. State of Punjab reported in AIR 2013 SC 840
Gura Singh vs. State of Rajasthan reported in AIR 2001 SC 330
Golbar Hussain & Ors. Vs. State of Assam and Anr.
Gamini Bala Koteswara Rao and Ors. vs. State of A.P. reported in AIR 2010 SC 589 (1)
Iqbal Moosa Patel vs. State of Gujarat
Jagdishsinh @ Munno Ranjitsinh @ Ranubha Jadeja Vs. State of Gujarat
Kali Ram Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh
Kathi Bharat Vajsur and Anr. vs. State of Gujarat
Kavas Jahangir Mamabuwala vs. State of Gujarat
Lallu Manjhi and another vs. State of Jharkhand
Mahavir Singh vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Prabhoo v. State of Uttar Pradesh
State of Rajasthan Vs. Raja Ram
Sarwan Singh and Others vs. State of Punjab
Smt. Nagindra Bala Mitra and another vs. Sunil Chandra Roy and another reported in AIR 1960 SC 706
Upendra Pradhan Vs. State of Orissa
Vadivelu Thevar etc. v. State of Madras
Vahaji Ravaji Thakore and another vs. State of Gujarat reported in 2003 (3) G.L.H. 283
SupremeToday
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.