SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Guj) 727

S.R.BRAHMBHATT, A.J.SHASTRI
Ajim Yusufbhai Suryamemon – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : A.D. Shah
For the Respondents: L.R. Poojari

JUDGMENT :

A.J. Shastri, J.

1. The present Criminal Appeal is filed by the appellant-original accused under section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ('Cr.P.C.' for short) against the judgment and order dated 23.1.2015 passed in Sessions Case No. 37 of 2012 by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Jamnagar, whereby original accused was convicted and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs. 5000/- and in default of payment of fine, to undergo further simple imprisonment for six months for the offence punishable under section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and also ordered to undergo simple imprisonment for three months for the offence punishable under section 135(1) of Gujarat Police Act. Both these sentences were ordered to run concurrently. The accused was given set off for the period already undergone in jail.

2. The brief facts of the case are that on account of dispute between the appellant accused and the complainant side, though Shoeb and the appellant-accused were good friends, the accused was demanding the amount from Shoeb. As






































































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top