Anant S. Dave, J.

1. Heard Mr. Sudhir Nanavati, learned Senior Advocate, for the petitioners.

2. Rule. Learned counsel Mr. Satyam Chhaya waives notice of Rule on behalf of respondents.

2.1 With consent of learned counsels for the parties, the petition is taken up for hearing and disposal together.

3. The petitioners have filed this petition invoking extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the Tender Conditions; viz. [a] Condition No. 1(i) pertaining to 25% of total vehicles shall have to be owned by bidder with RTO passing year 2015; [b] Condition No. 3 which provides for disqualification if applicant or any of its constituent partners have been debarred or terminated or black listed by any State or Central Government agency; [c] Tenderer must have to submit bank solvency certificate to the extent of Rs. 2.92 crores; [d] Condition No. 10 which provides for 50% of the vehicle shall be owned by bidder for carrying out door to door work for collection of garbage as per notice inviting tender by respondent - AMC for door to door