M.R. SHAH, J.

As common question of law and facts arise in both these Letters Patent Appeals, they are disposed of by this common judgment and order.

2. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned common judgment and order passed by the learned Single Judge in Special Civil Application Nos. 10667/2012 and 10666/2012 by which the learned Single Judge has dismissed the said Special Civil Applications and has confirmed the respective awards passed by the learned Industrial Tribunal in Reference (IT) No. 60/1996 and Reference (IT) No. 36/1996 respectively, by which the learned Industrial Tribunal rejected the claim of the original workman of regularization and/or permanency and rejected the said references, the original workmen have preferred the present Letters Patent Appeals under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent.

3. The facts leading to the present Letters Patent Appeals in nutshell are as under:

4. That both the appellants herein - original workmen were serving as daily wagers. They raised an industrial dispute and claimed that on completion of 240 days, they are entitled to the permanency and they are required to be paid the pay scale which has been paid to the perma