SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Guj) 1419

M.R.SHAH, B.N.KARIA
Vanita Vishram – Appellant
Versus
Sarshwatiben Chhotubhai Patel W/o Jayantkumar M. Pachchigar – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Applicants : Mrs. Yogini V. Parikh and Mr. Varun K. Patel.
For the Respondents: Mr. Hardik Vora and Mr. Dhavan Jayswal.

ORDER :

M.R. SHAH, J.

1. All these applications are preferred by the respective applicants/original appellants i.e. original petitioners for an appropriate interim order to stay further implementation and operation of the respective judgment and orders passed by learned Single Judge in respective Special Civil Applications.

2. At the outset, it is required to be noted that earlier the Division Bench had granted interim relief; as prayed for in the respective matters and the same continues till the date. Main Appeals are heard by this Bench today and are reserved for orders. Under the circumstances, without prejudice to the rights of respective parties of the main Letters Patent Appeals, subject to outcome of the main Letters Patent Appeals, ad-interim granted in respective Civil Applications are directed to be continued till final disposal of the main Letters Patent Appeals.

3. All these Civil Applications stand disposed of accordingly.


Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top