SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(Guj) 1645

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
Abhilasha Kumari, A.J Shastri, JJ.
Jemi Ben W/o Jayantibhai Hirabhai Ledhavia Thakor - Applicant
Vs.
State of Gujarat - Respondent
Criminal Misc. Application (For Condonation of Delay) No. 4780 of 2017 In Criminal Appeal No. 201 of 2017
Decided On : 03-07-2017

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Applicant :HCLS Committee, Advocate, Ms. Meenu Kumar, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. J.K Shah, Addl. Public Prosecutor

Headnote:

Delay – Condonation – Application has been preferred by the applicant (original accused) with a prayer to condone the delay of 658 days that has occurred in filing the Criminal Appeal against the judgment, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Surendranagar, in Sessions Case – Held, Court consider it appropriate to condone delay – Delay of 658 days that has occurred in filing the Criminal Appeal is hereby condoned –Application Allowed (Paras 5, 6, 7)

ORDER :

ABHILASHA KUMARI, J.

1. Rule. Mr. J.K Shah, learned Additional Public Prosecutor waives service of notice of Rule for the respondent-State of Gujarat.

2. This application has been preferred by the applicant (original accused) with a prayer to condone the delay of 658 days that has occurred in filing the Criminal Appeal against the judgment dated 25.02.2015, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Surendranagar, in Sessions Case No. 25/2013.

3. Heard Ms. Meenu Kumar, learned advocate for the applicant and perused the averments made in the application.

4. It is submitted that the applicant is in Jail since 20.02.2013 He had applied for legal aid before the High Court Legal Services Committee. The papers of the appeal were handed over to the learned advocate, through the Legal Services Committee only on 15.01.2017 The advocate engaged could not immediately file the appeal due to health problem of her own. However, the appeal was filed on 14.02.2017 There has been a delay of 658 days in filing the appeal which has not occurred due to negligence or carelessness. Hence, the same may be condoned.

5. As the applicant has shown sufficient cause for the condonation of delay in the shape of the reasons assigned in paragraph-3 of the application, we consider it appropriate to condone the delay.

6. Hence, the following order is passed:

The delay of 658 days that has occurred in filing the Criminal Appeal is hereby condoned.

7. The application is allowed. Rule is made absolute.



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top