Heard learned advocate Mr. Rahil Patel for Nanavati Associates, Advocate for the petitioner. Though served with the Rule of this Court, none appeared for respondent Nos.1 to 3.

2. This petition is directed against order dated 17.07.2017 passed by the Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Gujarat State, in Civil Revision Application No. 54 of 2007. The Revision Application came to be dismissed by the Commission, upholding order dated 05.07.2005 below Exh.42 passed by the Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Jamnagar in Complain No. 296 of 2005. Thereby, the prayer of the petitioner herein to cross-examine the original complaint was not accepted.

3. Noticing the relevant facts, the complainant had purchased five bottles of Thumsup cold drink on 06.06.2005. Respondent No.3 issued bill and it was alleged by the complainant that the packing date printed on the bottle was 05.12.2002 and the price printed was Rs.5/-. Respondent No.3 had charged more price than what was printed. The complainant had alleged that he found dust in one of the bottles. For the deficiency in service, the case was filed before the Consumer Redressal Forum praying to award Rs.2,00,000/- as compensation. It